Voices on both sides of the gun control debate were heard Tuesday in Sacramento, as the Senate Committee on Public Safety discussed a package of new laws that could place new restrictions on the types of guns and ammunition that Californians are allowed to own.
The eight bills that make up the LIFE Act aim to tighten state gun laws through various approaches, including prohibiting the future sale and manufacture of semi-automatic rifles with detachable magazines, banning the possession of ammunition magazines that hold more than 10 bullets, and updating the definition of an illegal assault weapon to include more types of
Dozens of invited speakers and members of the public waited for hours to address to the seven-member committee, offering testimony that was at times heated and emotional, both in support of the LIFE Act and against it.
Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, who spoke in support of the bills, said that during his tenure as mayor, gang homicides have dropped 66 percent through a multi-pronged attack on gun violence that included gang intervention, community policing and stronger gun laws.
"Make our laws stronger," Villaraigosa said. "We owe this to those who have been shot, those who have been killed, parents who have lost their
children, and children who have lost their parents."
San Francisco resident Mattie Scott, whose son died in a shooting six years ago, said she was tired of young men in her community being killed.
"Please bring healing for our families and our nation," Scott said. "I'm tired of going to funerals. I want to go to graduations."
Cynthia Pillsbury, a Marin County mother of three and member of Moms Demand Gun Sense in America, wept as she recalled watching news coverage of the Dec. 14 shooting in Newtown, Conn., in which 20 elementary school children were killed.
"Their parents' hearts broke in a thousand pieces," she said. "They will never recover."
Dozens of pro-gun advocates acknowledged the horror of recent events and mass shootings, but argued that every American has the right to
own assault weapons and high-capacity magazines to protect themselves at home, a right that is guarded by the second amendment of the U.S.
Jim Ricketts, a member of the Placer Tea Party, said that if criminals on the street carried assault weapons, he should have the right to
own them too.
"I have the right to be on an even playing field as the criminals are," he said.
Del Norte County Sheriff Dean Wilson argued that the proposed laws would be ineffective at stopping mass shootings like the one in Newtown,
Conn., and added that banning more types of assault weapons would criminalize people who own those guns legally under current law.
"Nothing that is recommended here could have prevented these tragedies from happening," Wilson said. "You are making criminals out of decent people, hard-working citizens that don't deserve it."
"I will not enforce these laws," he said.
Congressman Eric Swalwell (D-Dublin) released a statement "slamming" the Senate for failing to expand background checks on firearm purchases
"After the tragedy in Newtown, we thought it could be different. Ninety-two percent of Americans support background checks on gun sales to prevent the mentally unstable and those with a criminal record from owning a firearm. Today, the Senate stood with eight percent of Americans, putting our communities at risk to further gun violence.
"It's our responsibility to listen to our constituents and I applaud the Senators who stood up for reasonable gun-safety.," he continued. "While disappointed by today's vote, I am not defeated, and I'll continue my efforts in the House to enact reasonable, common-sense gun safety reforms to protect our communities and keep our children safe. Americans deserve better."
If the bills are passed by the Committee on Public Safety, they will then be heard by the Appropriations Committee before moving to a full
debate by the state senate.