|
|
|
Uploaded: Wednesday, February 27, 2013, 4:33 PM
Possible rehab, development considered for Austin Root House
New owner wants to renovate historic house, add mixed use
|
|
by Jessica Lipsky
Photo
 | Danville's Planning and Heritage Resource commissions held a study session Tuesday night to discuss issues related to the possible development of a downtown parcel. Located at 120 West Linda Mesa Avenue, the property includes the historic Austin Root House.
Ardi Onsori recently purchased the 4,373 square foot property and approached the town with preliminary development plans to move the Root House east and forward, add 2,189 square feet of retail space to the left and behind the historic structure, and build three second story residential units. One of the units would be built as a second story addition to the Austin Root House, approximately 16 feet from the front of the porch.
"The consensus is that there was concern about no onsite parking because there's three residential units. Direction back to applicant is there should be onsite parking for residential use," said Principal Planner and Heritage Resource Liason David Crompton.
Built in 1919, the Austin Root House was relocated in 1950 to accommodate the gas station and, under this project, would be lowered 2 feet to sidewalk level. A staff report stated that the Austin house should be moved closer to the James Root House (relocated to 90 Railroad Avenue and built sometime in the late 1800s), but the move would disrupt the "historic spatial relationship" between the related homes.
"Because the Austin house is historic structure, the Heritage Resource Commission weighed in to make sure that addition and new building construction doesn't overwhelm structure and is done in a way that is compatible but different," Crompton said.
Although the Austin Root House is not registered as a heritage site, Crompton said the building could come up for consideration following completion of the new development. Part of Onsori's development plan includes restoration of the building and removal of non-original additions such as the rear porch, vinyl windows and partial enclosure on the front porch.
The unofficial proposal would also demolish the accessory structure at 120-A West Linda Mesa. Onsori proposed purchasing approximately 610 square feet of excess right-of-way along Railroad Avenue, which the Town Council was previously receptive to.
Planners and town officials also had concern about the floor area ratio (or ratio of total square feet of flooring on multiple levels divided by lot size) being 24 percent higher than designated under zoning code. The ratio basically limits structures to two stories to keep the "existing character of downtown Danville."
"With those concerns raised it's back to the property owner and architect to see if they want to submit an application," Crompton noted.
The plans would then go to the Design Review Board, Heritage Resource Commission and Planning Commission. The project is not on any agenda yet. Are you receiving Express, our free daily e-mail edition? See a sample and sign-up for Express.
|
|
| Comments
|
Posted by Derek, a resident of the Danville neighborhood, on Mar 3, 2013 at 10:25 am This is pretty strange article. Have I been having hallucinations, or is there not already a huge, hideous, utterly out-of-place rear addition to the historic A-frame/craftsman that was pushed forward to Railroad Avenue on the northeast corner of Linda Mesa?
This project represents in no ambiguous way what an abject failure our planning commission and council members are in representing the interests of Danville citizens.
Did some brilliant architect win an award for the rear addition? "Let's use one of little Tyler's building blocks for a model, add a couple windows, make sure it towers over everything in the area like a giant carbuncle, and submit it to Architectural Digest for review."
Yeah, that's the ticket. Thanks again to the planning commission, and Newell and Arny for their diligent service.
|
|
Posted by jrm, a member of the Vista Grande Elementary School community, on Mar 3, 2013 at 7:19 pm Exactly....I wrote about this 6 months ago. This building is most curious. It's like they crammed a residential unit behind the most ugly painted house in downtown Danville. Brown on Brown....Thanks Newell and Renee...one more reason why we feel the incumbents are ruining our town.
|
|
Posted by Huh?, a resident of the Danville neighborhood, on Mar 4, 2013 at 11:27 am So..... the fact that a private property owner is seeking approval to alter his property (but hasn't actually applied for or received permission to do so, and is getting discouraging messages from the Town staff) means that "the incumbents are ruing our town?"
Are you folks really that desperate to find stuff to complain about that you post this nonsense? Do you even read the articles before writing your predictable criticisms of what you assume the answers are of people who haven't even been asked a question yet?
|
|
Posted by Derek, a resident of the Danville neighborhood, on Mar 5, 2013 at 7:29 pm @Huh
Have you even looked at the structure that I am referring to? The addition I am talking about isn't in the permitting stage - it's already done. I don't know what the article refers to - it seems to be a reprint of something from a year ago. Do you not even go to Trader Joe's Mr. Huh? Or do you drive with blinders on playing with your tweety device like most Danville yup's? Did you read what I wrote above, or is that a challenge as well? Go look at the northeast corner of Railroad & Linda Mesa before posting your nonsense.
|
|
|
| |
|