Alamo cityhood supporters are providing answers
Original post made on Aug 23, 2007
Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 3:10 PM
on Aug 23, 2007 at 5:32 pm
Very clever PR by Mr. Chris Kenber, Natalie,
By focusing any attention on his reputation, he distracts the Alamo community from the special interests of the other AIM committee members and their relationships with the AIA, SRV YMCA, county agencies and former roles in county agencies. By focusing his commentary of the general activities of "educating Alamo residents" he avoided answering any more than the <400 AIM supporters.
It remains the challenge for AIM to address the majority in Alamo with a PLAN that will fulfill AIM's promises via the actions of city councils following incorporation. Chris did not answer that challenge and has not answered that challenge outside AIM's minority of supporters.
Applause to Chris from a fellow marketeer,
on Aug 23, 2007 at 7:38 pm
Thank you, Mr. Bailey,
It would seem if this ad hoc committee is going to meet with 25 people at a time, we need to calculate how long it will take to meet with the 16,000 residents of Alamo.
If I did my math right, it will take 640 consecutive days!
In the meantime, maybe a reporter can pin these committee members down to a PLAN on just how they are going to complete the broad promises they are making to their Alamo neighbors.
Kim, Round Hill
on Aug 24, 2007 at 1:13 am
One factual correction to the article. Alamo only represents about 5% to 6% of the voting power of one of the five supervisorial districts (District III), not the entire County. That's how little electoral effect the entire community of Alamo has on County government.